- Even at a sentence per point, they take ages to read.
- It’s impossible to develop a nuanced point within one short sentence…
- … making them a bit like the overripe, shouty hellhole that is social media.
- Most points are led by search terms like ‘freelance copywriter‘, not whether they have anything to actually say.
- Google loves long content – this is just the laziest way to deliver it without really saying much.
- They incentivise being shallow.
- They incentivise a lack of depth.
- They’re unavoidably repetitive and say the same things in different ways.
- Human beings aren’t built to actually take in numerous points – that’s why the most persuasive ads say just one thing well.
- The people who retweet them are impressed by your stamina, not your ideas (which they probably didn’t read).
- The trick is getting old. The novelty factor that made them fun is long gone.
- Reading through them is a big activity in itself. Asking for people to take another action afterwards (like getting in touch) is a bit much.
- Calls to action are best when every sentence is geared to one outcome.
- Red call to action buttons test surprisingly well.
- You have to go on tangents over multiple points to edge close to your arbitrary number.
- They’re unavoidably repetitive.
- They make every point feel equal in value – it’s no longer about what you feel is important, so it becomes impossible to reflect any kind of consistent brand character or perspective.
- They offer the illusion of depth, not depth.
- In an effort to fill space, that search term you cared about so much falls by the wayside (freelance copywriter).
- They’re soul destroying to write. Believe me, I know.
- Who has ever wanted to know 101 things about anything?
- The one unusual thing you believe with all your heart is infinitely more interesting.
- Even if you make great points about the way people think and take in ideas, they’re lost in the clutter of your never ending list.
- They’re unordered lists masquerading as ordered lists, which is a fucking joke.
- You start getting desperate for ways to make it interesting again – even swearing, which is a pretty cheap tactic.
- Even if they work for search engines, it’s bouncy traffic that doesn’t convert or come back.
- They require a commitment of time that is not proportionate to their impact – even when they work, they’re a poor investment.
- When they don’t, you’ve written 101 useless statements for no reason.
- Worse, you might have written 101 really great, well thought-out points for no reason.
- They’re rarely attractive to read – just an endless, meandering list that’s not broken up or bite-sized.
- They’re almost unreadable on mobile.
- Forcing people to scroll so much opens you up to potential personal injury claims.
- You may also get people just asking for a refund on their time.
- They’re repetitive.
- They exist purely for search engines – you might please the robots, but rarely please the people beyond your feat of longevity.
- Research shows that people hate the number 101 because of Cruella De Vil.
- Research shows that people love the number 101 because of Depeche Mode.
- It’s too easy to write points that directly contradict themselves for the sake of quantity.
- It’s too easy to make stuff up or guess at research when you get desperate.
- It’s too easy to fill space if you don’t care about the quality of what’s inside it.
- It’s too easy to latch onto one sentence structure because it makes it quicker to write.
- It’s hard to stop once you start.
- It’s almost impossible to write 101 points if you pick a very specific title like ‘101 Reasons Long List Posts Like This Are Crap’.
- So you go for really generic stuff like ‘The pros and cons of long blog posts’ or ‘Reasons you shouldn’t write your blog post for search engines’.
- Unless you’ve got balls of steel.
- Which you could be using to do something genuinely brave and interesting, not copying a stale format.
- You could go bungee jumping or something.
- What was I even talking about?
- Oh yeah.
- Long list blog posts.
- They make the number the star of the show – not the actual information that’s there.
- They go against the notion of get in, say your stuff, boss people around, then get out.
- You start breaking things that should be paragraphs into numbered points.
- It’s completely random when you decide to move to the next number.
- They’re crap for the same reason a good freelance copywriter doesn’t charge per word – because the words are just the execution. It’s the ideas that count.
- Posts that consist of 101 distinct, developed, interesting and specific points are incredible – but incredibly rare.
- Content is king, but not if it’s crap.
- You start using catchphrases and mantras just to bulk it out.
- They’re no longer unique and distinctive. I see them all the time.
- They’re repetitive.
- They don’t make sense for most industries. They were once interesting in some service industries, but ‘101 uses for chicken stock’ is clutching at straws.
- There’s no meritocracy – every idea makes it in.
- Longer posts take longer to read than short ones.
- You even include points are utterly meaningless and obvious.
- Like longer posts take longer to read than short ones.
- They’re relentlessly repetitive.
- Removing stuff is a vital part of good writing – but removing even a single point in a list post feels like a terrifying prospect.
- They usually lack a cohesive structure – the points become arbitrary, not a clear ‘beginning, middle and end’ like you were taught in primary school.
- They’re seen as the holy grail of SEO – the fabled list post meets a big word count – but ten 50 word posts that people actually like is worth way more if people engage with it, link to it and so on.
- Eventually, you accept that your well has run dry and just start plugging stuff into Google and including whatever you find.
- It’s easy to read a long list post for a bit then stop without feeling bad (The Guardian, 2013)
- You’ll even use sources that are way out of date
- They lack any logical glue – the cause and effect stuff and internal narratives that actually make us follow an idea and remember it (The Guardian, 2013).
- You’ll even use the same outdated source twice.
- The list format is a crutch for people who can’t write (Neil Patel).
- To fill space, you distill nuanced discussions from experts into a glib, probably inaccurate statement.
- You don’t care as long as the number goes up.
- If you pick a popular ‘reasons’ type of format, you only give one side of an argument.
- They can’t account for the full grey area of anything.
- A great long list post can stand out, but the odds of writing one are slim.
- Any data-driven promise that long list posts work omits the fact that the data is out of your hands – it works for an algorithm one day that can (and will) change tomorrow.
- A good blog (website, letter, email, whatever) is timely not because of its quirky format but because of what’s inside it.
- The ideas you throw out are as important as the ones you keep in.
- If a blog is supposed to be informative, people want answers. This format makes it hard to find them.
- As a freelance copywriter (I know, search terms right?), I’ve never introduced myself to a client with ‘I can write really long stuff’.
- Nor have many clients read my blog. But that’s another post.
- If you renamed it ‘101 sentences…’ rather than points (which is more accurate), would anyone care?
- To anyone with even a cursory knowledge of marketing, they feel spammy.
- To everyone else, they feel long.
- To the writer, even longer.
- They usually lack subheads – your hottest real estate for delivering interesting points, teases or benefits…
- … and if they do, they become even more like a blog post with arbitrary numbers inserted.
- They can make people feel tricked for reading 90+ points and learning nothing.
- They feel like a war of attrition, where just reaching the end is the goal.
- They lend themselves to facts, not opinions or perspectives – so you miss the real opportunity to be share your point of view.
- They present you or your brand as being good at writing long stuff. Not good at knowing what to say, or making people care.
- There aren’t 101 interesting facts about my kids, let alone your product or service.
- There aren’t 25 truly interesting, memorable and impactful facts about most the stuff we’re peddling on the internet.
- They’re endlessly, relentlessly repetitive.
- And even when that repetitive format is used to make a point, it’s barely worth the wait.
- is an impressive number, one that says ‘I could make it past 100’. So, if you make it that far as a writer or a reader, good job. At least you didn’t waste your time reading something valuable, learning a new thing, or talking to a friend.
101 reasons long list posts like this are crap
Reason zero.
These long-format list posts I keep seeing all over the place take a huge investment of time and energy to write.
So any introduction never gives a deep sense of perspective, or motivation.
It’s just a rushed afterthought with the microscopic level of effort that is still available.